Smriti Mandhana Wedding Called Off: Real Reason, Breakup Drama & Rumours Explained (2025)

India’s cricketing star Smriti Mandhana and music composer Palash Muchhal have publicly confirmed that their wedding has been called off — a development that sent social feeds into a meltdown. In this post we separate verified facts (what reporters and the couple officially released) from the spicy fan theories that exploded across X, Instagram reels and WhatsApp groups. Read on for a timeline, media analysis and a labelled list of the rumours doing the rounds.

Verified facts — what news outlets have confirmed

1) The couple confirmed the wedding was called off. Major news outlets have published statements from both Smriti and Palash confirming that the wedding — previously postponed — has now been officially called off and that they intend to move forward separately.

2) Social-media signals backed the reports. Reporters noted both parties removed shared photos, unfollowed one another on social platforms, and some proposal/wedding clips were deleted — actions that fuelled coverage.

3) Health scare & postponement preceded the cancellation. Earlier the ceremony was postponed reportedly after Smriti’s father had a medical emergency and Palash also faced a health scare — these events were part of reporting that preceded the breakup announcement.

4) Legal concerns were raised by Palash. Media outlets report Palash Muchhal signalled intent to take action against “baseless rumours” and defamatory posts circulating online. That legal-safety angle is now part of the story.

The Rumour Mill — spicy claims circulating (clearly labelled as UNVERIFIED)

Important: the items below are rumours and social-media theories that spread rapidly online. They are included to show what audiences are discussing — not as factual claims.

• Viral sangeet clip “shows an awkward moment”

What people claimed: A clip from a sangeet went viral with fans saying an “awkward handshake” / “tension on the stage” signalled trouble. News outlets reported the clip circulated widely and reignited speculation. Whether the clip proves anything about the relationship is unverified.

• “Deleted proposal & deleted photos = betrayal?”

What people claimed: Fans pointed to deleted proposal videos and removed pictures as hinting at a dramatic fallout. While deletion is factually reported (see verified facts), any motive (betrayal, family dispute, outside influence) remains pure speculation unless corroborated by trusted sources.

• Family pressure / wedding planners drama

What people claimed: Multiple threads speculated about family disagreements or vendor problems after the last-minute postponement. No major outlet has confirmed a definitive “family feud” as the cause - it’s a social-media theory amplified by comments and anonymous sources. Treat as unproven.

• “Someone else” - cheating rumours (unverified, dangerous)

What people claimed: Some corners of the internet floated allegations of infidelity. These are high-risk, unverified claims that can be defamatory. Neither major outlets nor the couple’s statements validated such claims — so they remain unsubstantiated gossip and must be treated with caution.

• Health drama was a cover story

What people claimed: A few threads suggested the reported health emergency was a pretext for deeper issues between the couple. Again, this is a speculation loop: the health incidents are reported factually, but any “cover story” claims are speculation.

How news channels and social media handled it — quick analysis

Mainstream media: Reputable outlets focused on facts: the postponement due to family health, the subsequent deletion of social posts, and the couple’s own statements calling the wedding off. Headlines emphasized the official confirmations and the couple’s request for privacy.

Entertainment & gossip hubs: These channels amplified viral clips and fan theories, often displaying the most sensational angles — sometimes without full verification. Those pieces drove conversation but not necessarily verified facts.

X / Instagram / Reels: Fast, visual, and emotional - social feeds turned small signals (an unfollow, a deleted reel, a cryptic post from friends/celeb pals) into definitive narratives. This is how speculation snowballs into trending topics.

Legal & safety angle: Because Palash publicly mentioned legal action against defamatory content, several outlets began cautioning readers about unverified claims and defamatory posts — an indicator that some online conversations crossed into potentially harmful territory.

Bottom line — what readers should remember

• Confirmed: The wedding has been called off and both parties urged privacy. This is the central, verified fact.
• Reported but not proof: Deleted posts, unfollows and viral clips happened — these are observable signals but not conclusive proof of specific causes.
• Rumours that accuse individuals: Treat them with scepticism — they can be defamatory and are unverified. Multiple outlets have warned against spreading baseless claims.